<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: 16 Useful apt Command Examples for Ubuntu/Debian Linux	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.tecmint.com/apt-command-in-linux/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.tecmint.com/apt-command-in-linux/</link>
	<description>Tecmint - Linux Howtos, Tutorials, Guides, News, Tips and Tricks.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2026 05:55:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Ravi Saive		</title>
		<link>https://www.tecmint.com/apt-command-in-linux/comment-page-1/#comment-2380118</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ravi Saive]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2026 05:55:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tecmint.com/?p=19942#comment-2380118</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.tecmint.com/apt-command-in-linux/comment-page-1/#comment-2380105&quot;&gt;Lee_Berry&lt;/a&gt;.

@Lee,

You’re right that &lt;code&gt;apt -v&lt;/code&gt; (or &lt;code&gt;apt --version&lt;/code&gt;) is no longer reliable on some newer builds and minimal installs, so your workaround is a valid way to confirm whether a package is present.
&lt;pre&gt;
apt list &#124; fgrep pkg.name &#124; more
&lt;/pre&gt;
However, for accuracy and cleaner output, a better approach is:
&lt;pre&gt;
apt list --installed &#124; fgrep pkg.name
&lt;/pre&gt;
These only search installed packages and avoid scrolling through the entire repository list.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a target="_blank" href="https://www.tecmint.com/apt-command-in-linux/comment-page-1/#comment-2380105">Lee_Berry</a>.</p>
<p>@Lee,</p>
<p>You’re right that <code>apt -v</code> (or <code>apt --version</code>) is no longer reliable on some newer builds and minimal installs, so your workaround is a valid way to confirm whether a package is present.</p>
<pre>
apt list | fgrep pkg.name | more
</pre>
<p>However, for accuracy and cleaner output, a better approach is:</p>
<pre>
apt list --installed | fgrep pkg.name
</pre>
<p>These only search installed packages and avoid scrolling through the entire repository list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Lee_Berry		</title>
		<link>https://www.tecmint.com/apt-command-in-linux/comment-page-1/#comment-2380105</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lee_Berry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2026 05:23:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tecmint.com/?p=19942#comment-2380105</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;code&gt;apt version&lt;/code&gt; or &lt;code&gt;&#039;-v&#039;&lt;/code&gt; no longer works, so I used &lt;code&gt;&#039;apt list &#124; fgrep pkg.name &#124; more&#039;&lt;/code&gt; instead.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><code>apt version</code> or <code>'-v'</code> no longer works, so I used <code>'apt list | fgrep pkg.name | more'</code> instead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: dragonmouth		</title>
		<link>https://www.tecmint.com/apt-command-in-linux/comment-page-1/#comment-1577558</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dragonmouth]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2021 12:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tecmint.com/?p=19942#comment-1577558</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.tecmint.com/apt-command-in-linux/comment-page-1/#comment-1576390&quot;&gt;Knighthawk5193&lt;/a&gt;.

Actually, I do.  This is one of the more logical ones.  It is more sensible than many distro developers &quot;protecting users from themselves&quot; by disallowing explicit root login.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a target="_blank" href="https://www.tecmint.com/apt-command-in-linux/comment-page-1/#comment-1576390">Knighthawk5193</a>.</p>
<p>Actually, I do.  This is one of the more logical ones.  It is more sensible than many distro developers &#8220;protecting users from themselves&#8221; by disallowing explicit root login.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Knighthawk5193		</title>
		<link>https://www.tecmint.com/apt-command-in-linux/comment-page-1/#comment-1576390</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Knighthawk5193]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2021 09:51:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tecmint.com/?p=19942#comment-1576390</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.tecmint.com/apt-command-in-linux/comment-page-1/#comment-1575516&quot;&gt;dragonmouth&lt;/a&gt;.

You gotta love these &quot;security measures&quot; eh?...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a target="_blank" href="https://www.tecmint.com/apt-command-in-linux/comment-page-1/#comment-1575516">dragonmouth</a>.</p>
<p>You gotta love these &#8220;security measures&#8221; eh?&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: dragonmouth		</title>
		<link>https://www.tecmint.com/apt-command-in-linux/comment-page-1/#comment-1575516</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dragonmouth]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2021 12:54:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tecmint.com/?p=19942#comment-1575516</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.tecmint.com/apt-command-in-linux/comment-page-1/#comment-1492546&quot;&gt;EFTHYMIOS TSOUTSOURIS&lt;/a&gt;.

That is how it should be.  That is a security feature.  Anybody looking over your shoulder will not be able to tell how many characters are in your password.  The system IS keeping track of the characters you type.

Type in your password and then hit ENTER.  You will be allowed into the system.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a target="_blank" href="https://www.tecmint.com/apt-command-in-linux/comment-page-1/#comment-1492546">EFTHYMIOS TSOUTSOURIS</a>.</p>
<p>That is how it should be.  That is a security feature.  Anybody looking over your shoulder will not be able to tell how many characters are in your password.  The system IS keeping track of the characters you type.</p>
<p>Type in your password and then hit ENTER.  You will be allowed into the system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
