<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments for Tecmint: Linux Howtos, Tutorials &amp; Guides	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.tecmint.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.tecmint.com</link>
	<description>Tecmint - Linux Howtos, Tutorials, Guides, News, Tips and Tricks.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2026 18:32:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		Comment on How to Run Shell Scripts with Sudo Command in Linux by Mrmeow		</title>
		<link>https://www.tecmint.com/run-shell-scripts-with-sudo-command-in-linux/comment-page-1/#comment-2447234</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mrmeow]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2026 18:32:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.tecmint.com/?p=27687#comment-2447234</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[You didn&#039;t need to edit sudoers. In your first screenshot, you ran the command as:

&lt;code&gt;sudo NameOfScript.sh&lt;/code&gt;

Then, in the second screenshot, you ran it as:

&lt;code&gt;sudo ./NameOfScript.sh&lt;/code&gt;

If you had used &lt;code&gt;./&lt;/code&gt; in the first screenshot, where you got the error, it would have worked.

If you&#039;re not in the directory containing the script, you can also specify the full path:

&lt;code&gt;sudo /folder/of/script/NameOfScript.sh&lt;/code&gt;

And if you already have the required sudo privileges, you can run the script without typing sudo:

&lt;code&gt;./NameOfScript.sh&lt;/code&gt;

Or, using the full path:

&lt;code&gt;/folder/of/script/NameOfScript.sh&lt;/code&gt;

The main issue was simply that &lt;code&gt;sudo NameOfScript.sh&lt;/code&gt; does not tell the shell to look in the current directory. 

&lt;code&gt;sudo ./NameOfScript.sh&lt;/code&gt; does.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You didn&#8217;t need to edit sudoers. In your first screenshot, you ran the command as:</p>
<p><code>sudo NameOfScript.sh</code></p>
<p>Then, in the second screenshot, you ran it as:</p>
<p><code>sudo ./NameOfScript.sh</code></p>
<p>If you had used <code>./</code> in the first screenshot, where you got the error, it would have worked.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re not in the directory containing the script, you can also specify the full path:</p>
<p><code>sudo /folder/of/script/NameOfScript.sh</code></p>
<p>And if you already have the required sudo privileges, you can run the script without typing sudo:</p>
<p><code>./NameOfScript.sh</code></p>
<p>Or, using the full path:</p>
<p><code>/folder/of/script/NameOfScript.sh</code></p>
<p>The main issue was simply that <code>sudo NameOfScript.sh</code> does not tell the shell to look in the current directory. </p>
<p><code>sudo ./NameOfScript.sh</code> does.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on 20 Linux Networking Interview Questions and Answers for 2026 by Johan Swenker		</title>
		<link>https://www.tecmint.com/networking-interview-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-2446958</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Johan Swenker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2026 10:11:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tecmint.com/?p=8195#comment-2446958</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[On troubleshooting, I always start with &lt;code&gt;`mtr 8.8.8.8`&lt;/code&gt;. It almost immediately gives me a complete overview of the network. It tests the link, IP address, route, and even DNS. So why run four commands when a single command can give you all the answers in one view?
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On troubleshooting, I always start with <code>`mtr 8.8.8.8`</code>. It almost immediately gives me a complete overview of the network. It tests the link, IP address, route, and even DNS. So why run four commands when a single command can give you all the answers in one view?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on 15 Bash (!) Operator Examples Every Linux User Should Know by spezialist		</title>
		<link>https://www.tecmint.com/logical-not-operator-linux-commands/comment-page-1/#comment-2445959</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[spezialist]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 06:14:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tecmint.com/?p=13425#comment-2445959</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[One correction:
&lt;code&gt;!:3*&lt;/code&gt; - Reuses arguments from the 3rd argument up to the last argument (the same as &lt;code&gt;!:3-$&lt;/code&gt;).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One correction:<br />
<code>!:3*</code> &#8211; Reuses arguments from the 3rd argument up to the last argument (the same as <code>!:3-$</code>).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on 25 Outstanding Backup Utilities for Linux Systems in 2024 by Christian Buhtz		</title>
		<link>https://www.tecmint.com/linux-system-backup-tools/comment-page-1/#comment-2443779</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Christian Buhtz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2026 17:45:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tecmint.com/?p=19643#comment-2443779</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.tecmint.com/linux-system-backup-tools/comment-page-1/#comment-2361859&quot;&gt;Peter&lt;/a&gt;.

Back In Time is actively maintained, fixed and improved... by me. ;) I took over the project round about 2022 with some other fellows.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a target="_blank" href="https://www.tecmint.com/linux-system-backup-tools/comment-page-1/#comment-2361859">Peter</a>.</p>
<p>Back In Time is actively maintained, fixed and improved&#8230; by me. ;) I took over the project round about 2022 with some other fellows.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on How to Resize ext4 Partitions and Filesystems in Linux by dragonmouth		</title>
		<link>https://www.tecmint.com/resize2fs-expand-ext4-filesystem-linux/comment-page-1/#comment-2443732</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dragonmouth]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2026 14:58:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.tecmint.com/?p=62341#comment-2443732</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Why go through all these contortions?  Just use GParted.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why go through all these contortions?  Just use GParted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
