<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: How to Disable Package Updates in Ubuntu, Debian and Mint	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.tecmint.com/disable-lock-blacklist-package-updates-ubuntu-debian-apt/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.tecmint.com/disable-lock-blacklist-package-updates-ubuntu-debian-apt/</link>
	<description>Tecmint - Linux Howtos, Tutorials, Guides, News, Tips and Tricks.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Oct 2024 07:44:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Ulli		</title>
		<link>https://www.tecmint.com/disable-lock-blacklist-package-updates-ubuntu-debian-apt/comment-page-1/#comment-1989940</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ulli]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2023 17:24:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tecmint.com/?p=18217#comment-1989940</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[These tips do not work for me at all. 

&lt;strong&gt;apt-mark hold&lt;/strong&gt; has no effect at all. I can install the package afterward without any problems.

Using a preferences file makes it impossible to install any software via &lt;strong&gt;aptitude&lt;/strong&gt; but not only the package intended. So I have to search at some other place for valuable tips to block &lt;strong&gt;apt&lt;/strong&gt; package installations]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These tips do not work for me at all. </p>
<p><strong>apt-mark hold</strong> has no effect at all. I can install the package afterward without any problems.</p>
<p>Using a preferences file makes it impossible to install any software via <strong>aptitude</strong> but not only the package intended. So I have to search at some other place for valuable tips to block <strong>apt</strong> package installations</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: dragonmouth		</title>
		<link>https://www.tecmint.com/disable-lock-blacklist-package-updates-ubuntu-debian-apt/comment-page-1/#comment-1566575</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dragonmouth]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2021 21:20:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tecmint.com/?p=18217#comment-1566575</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;Blocking Package Updates&quot; and &quot;Blacklisting Package Updates&quot; sections of the articles are confusing as written.

I am using MX Linux.  There are no &quot;&lt;strong&gt;/etc/apt/preferences&lt;/strong&gt;&quot; or &quot;&lt;strong&gt;/etc/apt/preferences.d/official-package-repositories.pref&lt;/strong&gt;&quot; files on my system.  Do I have to create one of them?

&quot;Another way to blacklist a package from installation is to update its entry in one of the files contained in &lt;strong&gt;/etc/apt/apt.conf.d/&lt;/strong&gt; directory which is &lt;strong&gt;01autoremove&lt;/strong&gt;.&quot;

Why not just give the full path of the file as &quot;&lt;strong&gt;/etc/apt/apt.conf.d/01autoremove&lt;/strong&gt;&quot;?  The way the sentence is written it is confusing.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Blocking Package Updates&#8221; and &#8220;Blacklisting Package Updates&#8221; sections of the articles are confusing as written.</p>
<p>I am using MX Linux.  There are no &#8220;<strong>/etc/apt/preferences</strong>&#8221; or &#8220;<strong>/etc/apt/preferences.d/official-package-repositories.pref</strong>&#8221; files on my system.  Do I have to create one of them?</p>
<p>&#8220;Another way to blacklist a package from installation is to update its entry in one of the files contained in <strong>/etc/apt/apt.conf.d/</strong> directory which is <strong>01autoremove</strong>.&#8221;</p>
<p>Why not just give the full path of the file as &#8220;<strong>/etc/apt/apt.conf.d/01autoremove</strong>&#8220;?  The way the sentence is written it is confusing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jack		</title>
		<link>https://www.tecmint.com/disable-lock-blacklist-package-updates-ubuntu-debian-apt/comment-page-1/#comment-996529</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jack]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2018 08:05:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tecmint.com/?p=18217#comment-996529</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Can You add EXAMPLE of &quot;How to block multiple packages from update&quot;, I mean, can I add them like this:
&lt;pre&gt;
# apt-mark hold libsmbclient smbclient samba-common samba-common-bin
&lt;/pre&gt;
Is this ok?
And in &quot;&lt;strong&gt;autoremove file&lt;/strong&gt;&quot;? Is this fine?
&lt;pre&gt;
Never-MarkAuto-Sections
{
&quot;metapackages&quot;;
&quot;restricted/metapackages&quot;;
&quot;universe/metapackages&quot;;
&quot;multiverse/metapackages&quot;;
&quot;oldlibs&quot;;
&quot;restricted/oldlibs&quot;;
&quot;universe/oldlibs&quot;;
&quot;multiverse/oldlibs&quot;;
&quot;smbclient&quot;;&quot;libsmbclient&quot;;&quot;samba-common&quot;;&quot;samba-common-bin&quot;;
};
};
&lt;/pre&gt;
Or it should be one package-in-one-line (?):
&lt;pre&gt;
Never-MarkAuto-Sections
{
&quot;multiverse/oldlibs&quot;;
&quot;smbclient&quot;;
&quot;libsmbclient&quot;;
&quot;samba-common&quot;;
&quot;samba-common-bin&quot;;
};
};
&lt;/pre&gt;
THANK YOU]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can You add EXAMPLE of &#8220;How to block multiple packages from update&#8221;, I mean, can I add them like this:</p>
<pre>
# apt-mark hold libsmbclient smbclient samba-common samba-common-bin
</pre>
<p>Is this ok?<br />
And in &#8220;<strong>autoremove file</strong>&#8220;? Is this fine?</p>
<pre>
Never-MarkAuto-Sections
{
"metapackages";
"restricted/metapackages";
"universe/metapackages";
"multiverse/metapackages";
"oldlibs";
"restricted/oldlibs";
"universe/oldlibs";
"multiverse/oldlibs";
"smbclient";"libsmbclient";"samba-common";"samba-common-bin";
};
};
</pre>
<p>Or it should be one package-in-one-line (?):</p>
<pre>
Never-MarkAuto-Sections
{
"multiverse/oldlibs";
"smbclient";
"libsmbclient";
"samba-common";
"samba-common-bin";
};
};
</pre>
<p>THANK YOU</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: john		</title>
		<link>https://www.tecmint.com/disable-lock-blacklist-package-updates-ubuntu-debian-apt/comment-page-1/#comment-944429</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[john]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2017 15:05:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tecmint.com/?p=18217#comment-944429</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;Pin-Priority: 1&quot; &#060;- That&#039;s not less than zero.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Pin-Priority: 1&#8221; &lt;- That&#039;s not less than zero.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Gah-Muti		</title>
		<link>https://www.tecmint.com/disable-lock-blacklist-package-updates-ubuntu-debian-apt/comment-page-1/#comment-899921</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gah-Muti]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jul 2017 22:26:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tecmint.com/?p=18217#comment-899921</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Very nice tip. Thanks very much. I had this issue with Texlive on ubuntu 16.04. Each time I selected &quot;sudo apt-get upgrade&quot;, Texlive will also upgrade, which is huge and wastes my data volume.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nice tip. Thanks very much. I had this issue with Texlive on ubuntu 16.04. Each time I selected &#8220;sudo apt-get upgrade&#8221;, Texlive will also upgrade, which is huge and wastes my data volume.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
