<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: How to Generate and Verify MD5 Checksums in Linux [5 Methods]	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.tecmint.com/generate-verify-check-files-md5-checksum-linux/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.tecmint.com/generate-verify-check-files-md5-checksum-linux/</link>
	<description>Tecmint - Linux Howtos, Tutorials, Guides, News, Tips and Tricks.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2026 06:31:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Ravi Saive		</title>
		<link>https://www.tecmint.com/generate-verify-check-files-md5-checksum-linux/comment-page-1/#comment-2400208</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ravi Saive]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2026 06:31:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tecmint.com/?p=22969#comment-2400208</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.tecmint.com/generate-verify-check-files-md5-checksum-linux/comment-page-1/#comment-2399472&quot;&gt;BLewis&lt;/a&gt;.

@Blewis,

Fair point, you’re right.

A &lt;strong&gt;checksum&lt;/strong&gt; is for integrity, not security, and &lt;strong&gt;MD5&lt;/strong&gt; is cryptographically broken and deprecated for any security-sensitive use and modern practice is to use &lt;strong&gt;SHA-256&lt;/strong&gt; or stronger.

&lt;strong&gt;MD5&lt;/strong&gt; still exists mainly for quick, non-adversarial integrity checks, but it shouldn’t be relied on for anything involving trust or verification against attackers.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a target="_blank" href="https://www.tecmint.com/generate-verify-check-files-md5-checksum-linux/comment-page-1/#comment-2399472">BLewis</a>.</p>
<p>@Blewis,</p>
<p>Fair point, you’re right.</p>
<p>A <strong>checksum</strong> is for integrity, not security, and <strong>MD5</strong> is cryptographically broken and deprecated for any security-sensitive use and modern practice is to use <strong>SHA-256</strong> or stronger.</p>
<p><strong>MD5</strong> still exists mainly for quick, non-adversarial integrity checks, but it shouldn’t be relied on for anything involving trust or verification against attackers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: BLewis		</title>
		<link>https://www.tecmint.com/generate-verify-check-files-md5-checksum-linux/comment-page-1/#comment-2399472</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[BLewis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2026 16:11:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tecmint.com/?p=22969#comment-2399472</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A checksum does not make anything &quot;more secure&quot;. It&#039;s only a digital fingerprint used to verify that the data has not been altered.

Further, the &lt;strong&gt;MD5&lt;/strong&gt; checksum has been officially DEPRECATED for any security-sensitive use since at least 2011, and the industry has largely shifted to &lt;strong&gt;SHA-256&lt;/strong&gt; (part of the &lt;strong&gt;SHA-2 family&lt;/strong&gt;) or &lt;strong&gt;SHA-3&lt;/strong&gt;.

NO ONE should be using MD5 checksums today.  You should&#039;ve started with this.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A checksum does not make anything &#8220;more secure&#8221;. It&#8217;s only a digital fingerprint used to verify that the data has not been altered.</p>
<p>Further, the <strong>MD5</strong> checksum has been officially DEPRECATED for any security-sensitive use since at least 2011, and the industry has largely shifted to <strong>SHA-256</strong> (part of the <strong>SHA-2 family</strong>) or <strong>SHA-3</strong>.</p>
<p>NO ONE should be using MD5 checksums today.  You should&#8217;ve started with this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Sean Brannon		</title>
		<link>https://www.tecmint.com/generate-verify-check-files-md5-checksum-linux/comment-page-1/#comment-2240975</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Brannon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2024 07:17:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tecmint.com/?p=22969#comment-2240975</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Consider using the vastly superior &lt;strong&gt;hashdeep&lt;/strong&gt; suite (formerly known as &lt;strong&gt;md5deep&lt;/strong&gt;). It can recurse through directories, or prevent recursion. You can check directory trees and display only the files that don&#039;t match a list in a given file, or conversely, only show those that do match. And much more.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Consider using the vastly superior <strong>hashdeep</strong> suite (formerly known as <strong>md5deep</strong>). It can recurse through directories, or prevent recursion. You can check directory trees and display only the files that don&#8217;t match a list in a given file, or conversely, only show those that do match. And much more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Silversurfer		</title>
		<link>https://www.tecmint.com/generate-verify-check-files-md5-checksum-linux/comment-page-1/#comment-1037688</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Silversurfer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2018 05:36:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tecmint.com/?p=22969#comment-1037688</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thank you!

For this useful article to geneerate and verify files with md5 checksum in linux.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you!</p>
<p>For this useful article to geneerate and verify files with md5 checksum in linux.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
