<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: 10 Myths About GNU/Linux Operating System	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.tecmint.com/gnu-linux-myths/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.tecmint.com/gnu-linux-myths/</link>
	<description>Tecmint - Linux Howtos, Tutorials, Guides, News, Tips and Tricks.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2023 15:10:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: dragonmouth		</title>
		<link>https://www.tecmint.com/gnu-linux-myths/comment-page-1/#comment-1951024</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dragonmouth]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2023 15:10:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tecmint.com/?p=4042#comment-1951024</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;10. The Linux Ecosystem is Highly Fragmented&quot;

&quot;&lt;strong&gt;Diverse&lt;/strong&gt;&quot; is just another way of saying &quot;&lt;strong&gt;fragmented&lt;/strong&gt;&quot;.  Another word that comes to mind is &quot;&lt;strong&gt;balkanized&lt;/strong&gt;&quot;.

Linux&#039;s greatest strength (the freedom of choice) is also its biggest weakness. Because of Linux&#039;s ethos, any Tom, Dick, or Harry can have his 15 minutes of fame by creating a distro or an application. Just make a few cosmetic changes and there&#039;s a new distro. Just make a few cosmetic changes and you have a new application.  

How many of those &quot;&lt;strong&gt;new&lt;/strong&gt;&quot; distros or applications are like all the other distros and applications?  DistroWatch has over a thousand distros in its database with 230+ of them being actively developed and supported.  

How many of those distros are truly unique?  Why do we NEED 3 &quot;&lt;strong&gt;universal packaging systems&lt;/strong&gt;&quot; (&lt;strong&gt;AppImage&lt;/strong&gt;, &lt;strong&gt;FlatPack&lt;/strong&gt; &#038; &lt;strong&gt;Snap&lt;/strong&gt;)?  They are incompatible with each other but they achieve the exact same purpose.  

Why do we need 10-15 versions of each application?  Wouldn&#039;t 2 or 3 be enough?  Is it ego?  Why not harness all the &quot;creativity&quot; to improve existing projects?!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;10. The Linux Ecosystem is Highly Fragmented&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;<strong>Diverse</strong>&#8221; is just another way of saying &#8220;<strong>fragmented</strong>&#8220;.  Another word that comes to mind is &#8220;<strong>balkanized</strong>&#8220;.</p>
<p>Linux&#8217;s greatest strength (the freedom of choice) is also its biggest weakness. Because of Linux&#8217;s ethos, any Tom, Dick, or Harry can have his 15 minutes of fame by creating a distro or an application. Just make a few cosmetic changes and there&#8217;s a new distro. Just make a few cosmetic changes and you have a new application.  </p>
<p>How many of those &#8220;<strong>new</strong>&#8221; distros or applications are like all the other distros and applications?  DistroWatch has over a thousand distros in its database with 230+ of them being actively developed and supported.  </p>
<p>How many of those distros are truly unique?  Why do we NEED 3 &#8220;<strong>universal packaging systems</strong>&#8221; (<strong>AppImage</strong>, <strong>FlatPack</strong> &amp; <strong>Snap</strong>)?  They are incompatible with each other but they achieve the exact same purpose.  </p>
<p>Why do we need 10-15 versions of each application?  Wouldn&#8217;t 2 or 3 be enough?  Is it ego?  Why not harness all the &#8220;creativity&#8221; to improve existing projects?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: JohnT		</title>
		<link>https://www.tecmint.com/gnu-linux-myths/comment-page-1/#comment-1947541</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JohnT]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2023 13:35:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tecmint.com/?p=4042#comment-1947541</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It would be good to insert a new No 1 in your article - If you have an Android phone you are already using a variant of Linux. The user interface is dramatically different from the &#039;&lt;strong&gt;Windows style&lt;/strong&gt;&#039; desktop found in many Linux distributions, but look inside the &#039;&lt;strong&gt;About&lt;/strong&gt;&#039; entry in the &#039;&lt;strong&gt;Settings&lt;/strong&gt;&#039; menu and you will find most phones have a mention of Linux. 

Apple&#039;s IOS also has origins similar to Linux, but after years of adaptation to Apple&#039;s ecosystem, the evidence is much harder to find.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be good to insert a new No 1 in your article &#8211; If you have an Android phone you are already using a variant of Linux. The user interface is dramatically different from the &#8216;<strong>Windows style</strong>&#8216; desktop found in many Linux distributions, but look inside the &#8216;<strong>About</strong>&#8216; entry in the &#8216;<strong>Settings</strong>&#8216; menu and you will find most phones have a mention of Linux. </p>
<p>Apple&#8217;s IOS also has origins similar to Linux, but after years of adaptation to Apple&#8217;s ecosystem, the evidence is much harder to find.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ian		</title>
		<link>https://www.tecmint.com/gnu-linux-myths/comment-page-1/#comment-1946736</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ian]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2023 03:28:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tecmint.com/?p=4042#comment-1946736</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi, Under #10, you say

&quot;the differences between distributions should matter much since all share a common underlying kernel.&quot;

but surely you mean &quot;should not matter&quot; and &quot;they all share&quot;...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Under #10, you say</p>
<p>&#8220;the differences between distributions should matter much since all share a common underlying kernel.&#8221;</p>
<p>but surely you mean &#8220;should not matter&#8221; and &#8220;they all share&#8221;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Slip		</title>
		<link>https://www.tecmint.com/gnu-linux-myths/comment-page-1/#comment-1944501</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Slip]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2023 00:50:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tecmint.com/?p=4042#comment-1944501</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[7000+ Games are supported on Linux via Steam alone.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>7000+ Games are supported on Linux via Steam alone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Andy Marden		</title>
		<link>https://www.tecmint.com/gnu-linux-myths/comment-page-1/#comment-1944385</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andy Marden]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2023 18:01:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tecmint.com/?p=4042#comment-1944385</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;word processing is a feature of the OS&quot; - sounds dangerously like Windows monolithic-blob kind of thinking. I am sure you didn&#039;t mean that because word processing should absolutely not be a feature of any OS, but rather that a worthwhile OS needs to be able to support quality word-processing apps.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;word processing is a feature of the OS&#8221; &#8211; sounds dangerously like Windows monolithic-blob kind of thinking. I am sure you didn&#8217;t mean that because word processing should absolutely not be a feature of any OS, but rather that a worthwhile OS needs to be able to support quality word-processing apps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
