<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: How to Install Latest OpenOffice in Linux Desktop	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.tecmint.com/install-openoffice-in-linux/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.tecmint.com/install-openoffice-in-linux/</link>
	<description>Tecmint - Linux Howtos, Tutorials, Guides, News, Tips and Tricks.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2024 08:03:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: dragonmouth		</title>
		<link>https://www.tecmint.com/install-openoffice-in-linux/comment-page-1/#comment-1520604</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dragonmouth]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2021 19:11:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tecmint.com/?p=755#comment-1520604</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.tecmint.com/install-openoffice-in-linux/comment-page-1/#comment-1520422&quot;&gt;Tim&lt;/a&gt;.

&quot;I don’t understand why OpenOffice is not present in repositories any longer and why the OO developers don’t offer Appimage.&quot; Basically, because Apache does not have sufficient development staff.

&quot;I prefer OpenOffice&quot;
Why do you prefer OpenOffice to LibreOffice?  They&#039;re pretty much the same product, except LO is being actively developed and gets regular updates and OO has been pretty much stagnant since 2014.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a target="_blank" href="https://www.tecmint.com/install-openoffice-in-linux/comment-page-1/#comment-1520422">Tim</a>.</p>
<p>&#8220;I don’t understand why OpenOffice is not present in repositories any longer and why the OO developers don’t offer Appimage.&#8221; Basically, because Apache does not have sufficient development staff.</p>
<p>&#8220;I prefer OpenOffice&#8221;<br />
Why do you prefer OpenOffice to LibreOffice?  They&#8217;re pretty much the same product, except LO is being actively developed and gets regular updates and OO has been pretty much stagnant since 2014.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tim		</title>
		<link>https://www.tecmint.com/install-openoffice-in-linux/comment-page-1/#comment-1520422</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jun 2021 16:12:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tecmint.com/?p=755#comment-1520422</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hello,

OpenOffice should be offered as Appimage. That would be easier and would allow to have it next to LibreOffice. I don&#039;t understand why OpenOffice is not present in repositories any longer and why the OO developers don&#039;t offer Appimage. Personally, I prefer OpenOffice. In my Mint the default Y-theme doesn&#039;t like OO though...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,</p>
<p>OpenOffice should be offered as Appimage. That would be easier and would allow to have it next to LibreOffice. I don&#8217;t understand why OpenOffice is not present in repositories any longer and why the OO developers don&#8217;t offer Appimage. Personally, I prefer OpenOffice. In my Mint the default Y-theme doesn&#8217;t like OO though&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: dragonmouth		</title>
		<link>https://www.tecmint.com/install-openoffice-in-linux/comment-page-1/#comment-1519928</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dragonmouth]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jun 2021 14:25:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tecmint.com/?p=755#comment-1519928</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;Apache OpenOffice is a most popular and open-source application suite for Linux, Windows &#038; Mac&quot;.

That MAY have been true when you first wrote this article. However, for the past 6-7 years LibreOffice has been the office suite that is installed by default in the majority of Linux distros.  The last significant release of OpenOffice (4.1) was in 2014.  

Since then, there were only point releases introducing mostly cosmetic changes.  The reason for that is that the OpenOffice team has been steadily losing developers to the point that there are not enough of them left for Apache to maintain a vigorous development pace.  OpenOffice is falling further and further behind other office suites.  

OpenOffice has support for 41 languages while LibreOffice supports 119 at the latest count - three times as many.  

The above instructions call for installing Java first, then OpenOffice - two separate operations.  If the first one does not complete successfully, as has happened to several posters, the installation of the office suite cannot proceed.  Since at least LibreOffice 3.x, Java and Java Runtime Environment have been part of the default install of the LO suite.

Let&#039;s admit it, Apache Open Office is a niche product.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Apache OpenOffice is a most popular and open-source application suite for Linux, Windows &amp; Mac&#8221;.</p>
<p>That MAY have been true when you first wrote this article. However, for the past 6-7 years LibreOffice has been the office suite that is installed by default in the majority of Linux distros.  The last significant release of OpenOffice (4.1) was in 2014.  </p>
<p>Since then, there were only point releases introducing mostly cosmetic changes.  The reason for that is that the OpenOffice team has been steadily losing developers to the point that there are not enough of them left for Apache to maintain a vigorous development pace.  OpenOffice is falling further and further behind other office suites.  </p>
<p>OpenOffice has support for 41 languages while LibreOffice supports 119 at the latest count &#8211; three times as many.  </p>
<p>The above instructions call for installing Java first, then OpenOffice &#8211; two separate operations.  If the first one does not complete successfully, as has happened to several posters, the installation of the office suite cannot proceed.  Since at least LibreOffice 3.x, Java and Java Runtime Environment have been part of the default install of the LO suite.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s admit it, Apache Open Office is a niche product.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ravi Saive		</title>
		<link>https://www.tecmint.com/install-openoffice-in-linux/comment-page-1/#comment-902336</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ravi Saive]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2017 05:02:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tecmint.com/?p=755#comment-902336</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.tecmint.com/install-openoffice-in-linux/comment-page-1/#comment-902152&quot;&gt;naveed&lt;/a&gt;.

@Naveed,

First remove the LibfreOffice first from the system, because you can&#039;t install both LibreOffice and ApacheOffice on same Linux box.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a target="_blank" href="https://www.tecmint.com/install-openoffice-in-linux/comment-page-1/#comment-902152">naveed</a>.</p>
<p>@Naveed,</p>
<p>First remove the LibfreOffice first from the system, because you can&#8217;t install both LibreOffice and ApacheOffice on same Linux box.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: naveed		</title>
		<link>https://www.tecmint.com/install-openoffice-in-linux/comment-page-1/#comment-902152</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[naveed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2017 12:19:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tecmint.com/?p=755#comment-902152</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Operating system: Centos Linux, I have installed libre office few days back. Now I installed Apache Open office rpms successfully but when i try to install desktop integration I&#039;m getting an error. 

file /usr/bin/soffice from install of openoffice4.1.3-redhat-menus-4.1.3-9783.noarch conflicts with file from package libreoffice-core-1:5.0.6.2-5.el7_3.1.x86_64]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Operating system: Centos Linux, I have installed libre office few days back. Now I installed Apache Open office rpms successfully but when i try to install desktop integration I&#8217;m getting an error. </p>
<p>file /usr/bin/soffice from install of openoffice4.1.3-redhat-menus-4.1.3-9783.noarch conflicts with file from package libreoffice-core-1:5.0.6.2-5.el7_3.1.x86_64</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
