<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: 8 Best Lightweight Linux Distributions For Older Computers	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.tecmint.com/lightweight-linux-distributions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.tecmint.com/lightweight-linux-distributions/</link>
	<description>Tecmint - Linux Howtos, Tutorials, Guides, News, Tips and Tricks.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2023 07:24:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Gary W		</title>
		<link>https://www.tecmint.com/lightweight-linux-distributions/comment-page-1/#comment-2115142</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary W]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2023 07:24:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.tecmint.com/?p=45715#comment-2115142</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Nice to see a mention of TDE (Trinity Desktop Environment). This is a good fit for my Asus eeePC 701, which is about as old and weak as they come.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice to see a mention of TDE (Trinity Desktop Environment). This is a good fit for my Asus eeePC 701, which is about as old and weak as they come.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Lucio		</title>
		<link>https://www.tecmint.com/lightweight-linux-distributions/comment-page-1/#comment-2015028</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lucio]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2023 23:15:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.tecmint.com/?p=45715#comment-2015028</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I think this kind of article is not useful because we can&#039;t appreciate real differences from one to another distro; all are good, stables, etc.

Personally, I use Xubuntu for many years; it guarantees I easily find programs fully compatible with Windows standards even if some procedures like installing fonts are longer than under Windows.

In a 20-year-old supermarket cash computer with 1 GB ram, I use Puppy just because recognizes Vesa graphic card, that Xubuntu or lubuntu couldn&#039;t do the freezing installation. Nice, light but sometimes hard and I prefer to let it as it is. I use that pc only for emule, listen to music in the living room and backup center.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this kind of article is not useful because we can&#8217;t appreciate real differences from one to another distro; all are good, stables, etc.</p>
<p>Personally, I use Xubuntu for many years; it guarantees I easily find programs fully compatible with Windows standards even if some procedures like installing fonts are longer than under Windows.</p>
<p>In a 20-year-old supermarket cash computer with 1 GB ram, I use Puppy just because recognizes Vesa graphic card, that Xubuntu or lubuntu couldn&#8217;t do the freezing installation. Nice, light but sometimes hard and I prefer to let it as it is. I use that pc only for emule, listen to music in the living room and backup center.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: dragonmouth		</title>
		<link>https://www.tecmint.com/lightweight-linux-distributions/comment-page-1/#comment-2014333</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dragonmouth]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2023 12:25:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.tecmint.com/?p=45715#comment-2014333</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Tech writers, pundits and sundry other commentators glibly write about &quot;&lt;strong&gt;what&#039;s best for older computers&lt;/strong&gt;&quot; without ever defining the beast. Is it a 386 or is it a PC that is older than 1 year?  Or something in between?

In my 20+ years of distro hopping, I found that most of the light weight distros recommended for &quot;&lt;strong&gt;older computers&lt;/strong&gt;&quot; get that way by having features and functionality removed.  I run full blown distros on all my PCs, old and new. Granted, I don&#039;t get head snapping speeds on all of the PCs, bu then, I don&#039;t get a head snapping speed on my latest build.

BTW - &quot;Best&quot; is an ambiguous term, boiling down to what the author prefers. There are too many variables to consider.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tech writers, pundits and sundry other commentators glibly write about &#8220;<strong>what&#8217;s best for older computers</strong>&#8221; without ever defining the beast. Is it a 386 or is it a PC that is older than 1 year?  Or something in between?</p>
<p>In my 20+ years of distro hopping, I found that most of the light weight distros recommended for &#8220;<strong>older computers</strong>&#8221; get that way by having features and functionality removed.  I run full blown distros on all my PCs, old and new. Granted, I don&#8217;t get head snapping speeds on all of the PCs, bu then, I don&#8217;t get a head snapping speed on my latest build.</p>
<p>BTW &#8211; &#8220;Best&#8221; is an ambiguous term, boiling down to what the author prefers. There are too many variables to consider.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ravi Saive		</title>
		<link>https://www.tecmint.com/lightweight-linux-distributions/comment-page-1/#comment-2014217</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ravi Saive]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2023 06:21:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.tecmint.com/?p=45715#comment-2014217</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.tecmint.com/lightweight-linux-distributions/comment-page-1/#comment-2014205&quot;&gt;Daniel Claude Emile Sauthier&lt;/a&gt;.

@Daniel,

It all depends on the requirements of your hardware, I use Linux Lite on my older 2GB RAM PC which runs smoothly without any issues..]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a target="_blank" href="https://www.tecmint.com/lightweight-linux-distributions/comment-page-1/#comment-2014205">Daniel Claude Emile Sauthier</a>.</p>
<p>@Daniel,</p>
<p>It all depends on the requirements of your hardware, I use Linux Lite on my older 2GB RAM PC which runs smoothly without any issues..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Daniel Claude Emile Sauthier		</title>
		<link>https://www.tecmint.com/lightweight-linux-distributions/comment-page-1/#comment-2014205</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel Claude Emile Sauthier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2023 05:52:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.tecmint.com/?p=45715#comment-2014205</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I already used different Linux versions, which would you prefer?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I already used different Linux versions, which would you prefer?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
