4 Best Linux Boot Loaders

If You Appreciate What We Do Here On TecMint, You Should Consider:

  1. Stay Connected to: Twitter | Facebook | Google Plus
  2. Subscribe to our email updates: Sign Up Now
  3. Get your own self-hosted blog with a Free Domain at ($3.95/month).
  4. Become a Supporter - Make a contribution via PayPal
  5. Support us by purchasing our premium books in PDF format.
  6. Support us by taking our online Linux courses

We are thankful for your never ending support.

Aaron Kili

Aaron Kili is a Linux and F.O.S.S enthusiast, an upcoming Linux SysAdmin, web developer, and currently a content creator for TecMint who loves working with computers and strongly believes in sharing knowledge.

Your name can also be listed here. Got a tip? Submit it here to become an TecMint author.

RedHat RHCE and RHCSA Certification Book
Linux Foundation LFCS and LFCE Certification Preparation Guide

You may also like...

10 Responses

  1. Rohit Goswami says:

    I’m amazed rEFInd was left out. Certainly the best for modern computers. (ie. those on EFI machines [almost everyone now])

  2. SomeGuyOnInternet says:

    For me, rEFInd is always gonna be the best. (Not a Mac user)

  3. jymm says:

    The first boot loader I used was LILO on a Xandros install and it almost made me give up Linux forever. I had nothing but trouble. I was dual booting XP and Xandros and about ever third time I started the computer it would not boot.

    At that time I had no idea what to do. I know dual boot Debian and Ubuntu, no Windows. I also can fix things myself is my computer won’t boot. Grub also is in my humble opinion light years better than LILO.

    • Aaron Kili K says:

      @jymm

      I once tried LILO for learning purposes but i faced a lot of difficulty using it just as you have expressed here. GRUB works just fine for me now and it offers modern features and components. Importantly, many thanks for offering us your thoughts and encounter with LILO, and GRUB.

    • Nizhinski says:

      GRUB should be ‘light years better than LILO’. It was developed many years after LILO, presumably to improve on LILP.

  4. Jon Loveless says:

    I used to use Burg and loved its capability to present multiple looks and feels. It apparently hasn’t been updated in years and I honestly it should be presented here without that caveat.

  5. tino says:

    Syslinux url site, not work. change https to http.

    Regards.

Got something to say? Join the discussion.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Join Over 300K+ Linux Users
  1. 257,757
  2. 11,967
  3. 39,682

Are you subscribed?